Share your thoughts... Contribute to the ultimate A&A game design.
EDIT: Many of these can either be a 'given' for a specific NATION, or could be acquired through "R.&D." as a "Tech Roll", where this is determined to become 'utilized' by any.
HIGH Altitude Bomber:
These are IMMUNE to 'A-A' Defense when conducting a "S.B.R." or regular "Land" ATTACK, while "Interceptors" ATTACK at '2' VS them, except for JETS-'3', and they get to "Defend" as a '2' against those as well.
High Altitude Bombing against Naval Vessels was very imprecise, even when they were 'stationary', and hence its "deduction" against those. Recent 're-anaylized' evidence has discovered that it was an extremely 'unlucky' "High Altitude Bomber" involved with the "Pearl Harbor" ATTACK, that dropped a 'Bomb' down the "smokestack" of the Battleship "Arizona" during this. While within the "Midway" Campaign, then ALL of the "H.A.B."s managed to MISS their intended 'Targets'!
Defend-3('1'-time ONLY and DEFEND in same AREA only)-1(afterwards)
Treat as a 'regular' type of "Transport" in every other aspect.
The Allies, during "W.W.-2" in the 'Atlantic', needed a 'makeshift means' for defending against ATTACK upon their "Convoys". To this end, they devised a "one-time use" FIGHTER launched from the 'bow' of aptly equipped vessels during the interim, until "Escort Carriers" were created. This 'unit' has a once ONLY "Defense" of a '3'(based upon a D-6 Combat method) when "Attacked" by Aircraft or SUBs, otherwise it has a '1'-"Defense". When it has 'used' this, then replace that with a 'regular' kind of "Transport", to reflect its expenditure of its FIGHTER. EACH seperate 'one' of these can "Launch" its FIGHTER, to "Defend" against ATTACK, where this is applicable. This even includes subsequent "Rounds" for the SAME 'Area' under ATTACK, until that is concluded. THEN make substitutions for these where they have conducted any such "Defense".
*NOTE*-these usually were set-up with obsolete Airplanes, such as the "Hurricane" FIGHTER, and which is WHY they have their '3'-"Defense". They also have to be BUILT in whole, to reflect their COST for this, while there should NOT 'be' any kind of "reload", other than 'construction' of one of them.
When a much faster method was required to obtain constant aerial coverages, then there were these "Baby Flattops" created. Basing them upon converted "Merchantman" vessels, these were 'pumped out' in ever increasing numbers. Lacking adequate "Defenses", they weren't meant for other than a platform to "fly off" and later on "recover" Aircraft.
Considering that Germany ONLY 'built' just '10' of these during ALL of "W.W.-2", while they were able to achieve commendable "results" during their "hey-day", in comparison to ALL other 'means' utilized for the same purposes, then they ended up as being quite the 'bargain'. I'd even advocate an "Evasion" manner for them as well, when and where this is deemed as applicable during the course of 'gaming' sequences. Otherwise, they should be permitted to ATTACK within "Convoy Zones", thus 'Capturing' such, or along the coastline of an 'AREA' with an "Enemy I.C." in that. When this is within a "Sea Zone" adjacent to an "Enemy I.C.", they would roll a single D-6 for EACH of these Vessels located therein, inflicting a LOSS in "I.P."s for the affected 'Nation'.Where more than '1'-"Enemy I.C." is located within a "Sea Zone", then a seperate ATTACK has to be specified and designated upon such, before ANY are conducted, against ONE or ALL of those, with or where there are several individual Vessels of these located. They CAN make an ATTACK against "Enemy Transports" and/or 'others' by themselves, or in conjunction with additional 'Units'.The increased COST is to reflect their being "Armed" for this undertaking, while they also gain a 'benefit' in their "Defenses" as a result of that too, and they can act like a 'regular' kind of "Transport" in addition to the rest of their 'abilities'.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest