Larry wrote:National Objectives: This system is totally new to the game. Now each player has an objective related to its historic objectives. These objectives, if achieved will grant bonus income to the players achieving his stated objectives.
Can some one explain the thoughts behind this? I understand Archangel, that's the Lend-Lease rout, right? But what about the Allied forces. Is that just to make it less favourable to defend Russia with Allied units? If so, wouldn't it be logic to have the same rule when Soviet defend UK and China?
I.e: Soviet Gain 5 IPC if no other Allied force are present in a territory controlled by the Soviet Union and if no Soviet forces are present in any other Allied territories and if the Soviets control Archangel.
In A&A you may for example defend India with Soviet forces, but in most other strategy games, it is forbidden for Soviet to ender UK territories. And after have read Winston Churchill's "The Second World War" from 1953, UK would never had let Soviet in to their territories. UK actually was planning to defend Finland against the communists.
Yes, for sure. After Barbarossa the enemy (Stalin) of the enemy (Hitler) became Churchills friends. But you see what I mean with my question? During the end of the war, Churchill writes that Stalin refuced UK to enter Poland. Hence, the Patriotic War seems very realistic. However, don't you think that I have a point with Soviet forces defending India? Perhaps not... hmmm.. anyways, this is how we solved, and balanced, the new NO:Larry wrote:yeah... and he (Churchill) was ready to pass through neutral Sweden to do it if he had to. At that point in time it was getting harder and harder to figure out who posed the biggest problem for the allies... Stalin or Hitler.
House Rule Soviet National Objective
Despite the Lend Lease route (symbolized with the 5 IPC gain if Soviet control Archangels), UK and USA only cooperated with the Soviet Union because they had a common enemy; the Nazi Germany. Churchill would never allow the communist entering their territories, and Stalin would never sacrifice Soviet forces to defend them. Hence, you may add the following line in the Soviet National Objective:
- Gain 5 IPCs if no other Allied forces are present in a territory controlled by the Soviet Union, and if no Soviet forces are present in any other Allied territory, and if the Soviets control Archangels.
House Rule Japanese National Objective
Until the very last days of the war, there existed a Non-Aggression Pact between Soviet and Japan. To simulate this, House Rule 8 above actually gives a 5 IPC penalty if Soviet attack Japanese territories in China (i.e. entering an Allied territory). To also make it less favorable for Japan to attack Soviet, you may add this line in the Japanese National Objective:
- Gain 5 IPCs if Axis powers control all of the following territories: Manchuria, Kiangsu, French Indo-China/Thailand, and if no Japanese forces are present in any Soviet territory.
Anyway: I suppose you are all quite fed-up with all this House Rule questions. I must underline that A&A50 is the best thing that has happen since A&A was invented. I am a so happy I got the game before it was sold out!
Just belive me in this, sir, Sweden was never neutral. Sweden was pro-Axis, and if Churchill had been a real man, he would have cut Sweden down. I sure miss the classic MB 2 ed, with neutrals in play.Larry wrote:yeah... and he (Churchill) was ready to pass through neutral Sweden to do it if he had to.
My House rules:
You got a 5 IPC bonus if you controll Sweden and sea zone 7.
You got a 10 IPC bonus if you SBR Sweden just for fun.
On another note the Swedish Govenment agreed to a British request to allow volunteers to pass through Sweden, provided they traveled unarmed, without uniforms to help the Finns against the Russians.
Does the name Vidkun Quisling ring any bells?
But then again... how about those thousands of young Norwegians that suddenly appeared a few short days (hours actually) out of no where and began ambushing German truck convoys as they slowly and painfully advanced into Norway... I some how think that the same thing would have happened in Sweden had the situation been different. Good people are just that... good people.
1) Why dont the Bonus system include more sea zones ? Italy get a bonus if they controll the Mediteranean Sea, and this is a brilliant way to model the importance of convoys, shipping lanes and international trade. Since there are no convoy zones on the map, this bonus system could be the solution. But i guess you missed that ship.
2) Why is it not allowed to attack neutrals ? I have read the rulebook, and know it is not allowed, but I need to know why it is not allowed, because this rule beats me. In your Nova edition made in 1984, you allowed me to attack and conquer Sweden. But then just out of the blue, you now denie me the fun of harassing the neutrals, and I cant figure why in burning hell you do this to me, sir.
And dont blame this on WOTC, because you can easily make a FAQ or LHTR where you simply include this rules.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests